Emerson International Corporate Office & Headquarters

This is really hulefpl, You're a remarkably knowledgeable blogger. I have signed up with your feed and in addition look ahead to viewing a lot more of your brilliant write-up. Furthermore, I have distributed your web sites inside our web pages. Does your website have a contact page? I'm having difficulty locating it but, I want to send you a communication. I have some ideas for use in your blog site you could be keen on hearing. In either case, great site and i look ahead to seeing it grow even more over the years.

You commented that leviang out the quotation marks means the quote becomes a fact associated with the picture, rather than a quote using the picture. If I read this correctly it sounds like you're saying the picture is the important element with the words secondary yet supportive, while the other way is for the picture to be secondary to the words.Is this correct? And you also say it's effective how do you measure this? Gven that in each slide we see a recognisable face, and the name under the quote matches, is it possible that as long as you're consistent it makes little measurable difference. In some respects, by offering the name underneath the quote, the quotation marks become redundant, and perhaps take away from the clean and lean look I personally prefer and use. Sometimes having the quote in italics and the source in regular font can perform the same function.As an aside, the only time I ever read the words on a slide, is when I'm reading a quote and don't want to get it wrong; even then I'll try and alter my voice to somehow match how I think the author might sound, i.e, it's not my quote, it's theirs.